Homepage  
Search
find:
search for:
   
 
Site Navigation
News / Publications
Jobs
Service
   Add this page to Google Bookmarks
   Add this page to Mister Wong
   Add this page to del.icio.us
 
   Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute  CRSI / Engineering Data Report\Number 28 - Reinforced Concrete Design  

Reinforced Concrete Design - Page 3

 

 

WHO SHOULD APPROVE DETAILS?
    Traditionally the structural engineer - unequivocally the final decision maker - did indeed approve, approve with corrections, or disapprove proposed details. Only the structural engineer has performed the analyses for all loading effects and knows the effective area of steel required at all points, and thus should provide interpretations of ACI Building Code requirements and be familiar with recent research tests on the efficiency of such details as corners and joints.
    Some code requirements are ambiguous, i.e., capable of several good-faith interpretations by qualified structural engineers. A structural design drawing should show all of the responsible structural design engineer's interpretations in detail, and not rely for these on estimators, detailers, or reinforcing steel suppliers. The structural engineer who omits these interpretations to save design time should at least review all details and correct them as required for his approval before fabrication.
    Under design-and-build or fast-track construction, the traditional drawings review process is difficult to achieve. Construction begins with the foundation design before the superstructure design is complete. The basic structural design is done in the engineer's office; however, numerous incidental revisions often occur just prior to construction.

    Economics are achieved by the owner who permits the responsible structural engineer to hire an inspector who is fully familiar with the design engineer's details. A leisurely and complete review of shop drawings is not possible, and the inspector should be given authority to make as-built decisions in the field for the revisions being performed. Responsibility still lies with the structural engineer, since his inspector may or may not need to be a registered engineer, depending on the extent of revisions contemplated.

REFERENCES
1.    ACI Committee 315, "Details and Detailing of Concrete Reinforcement (ACI 315-80) (Revised 1986), "ACI Journal, Proceedings V 83, No. 3, May-June 1986, pp. 485-524.

2.    ACI Committee 315, ACI Detailing Manual - 1980, SP-66, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1980, 212 pp.

3.    ACI Committee 318, "Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-83)," American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1983, 111 pp.

4.    Uniform Building Code, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, 1985, 817 pp.

5.    Nilsson, Ingvar H. E., and Losberg, Anders, "Reinforced Concrete Corners and Joints Subjected to Bending Moment," Proceedings, ASCE, V. 102, ST6, June 1976, pp. 1229-1254.

*Request for Information / Request a Catalog
 
 
 
To request more information from Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute, please complete the form below.
 
*Name:    
*Email:    
Company:    
*Company type:    
Phone:    
*Address:    
*Request:    
    (* = Mandatory field) 
Please add me to the mailing list for the free monthly e-Newsletter AECnews.  
     






Printable version Bookmark this page Notify a colleague or friend about this pageHome | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Link to AECinfo
AECinfo is a member of Docu Group, the world's largest building products information network.



Copyright © 1996–2008 AECinfo.com