For projects designed in metric units and using metric reinforcing
bars, for example, designs by State Departments of Transportation, the furnishing of soft
metric bars is a non-issue in the context of this report.
The major challenges will be associated with construction projects
which are designed in inch-pound units, and the Rebar Fabricator desires to furnish soft
metric bars.
Mills. Tags on bundles
of soft metric bars being shipped to Fabricators should display or cross reference the
equivalent inch-pound bar sizes. Certified Mill Test Reports should be in metric units and
include equivalent inch-pound units.
Role of Rebar Fabricator.
The Rebar Fabricator, who will be furnishing soft metric bars to construction projects
which were originally designed in inch-pound units and will be built in inch-pound units,
assumes a key role in supporting the mills' initiative toward production of only soft
metric bars. First and foremost, the Rebar Fabricator will be obliged to serve as the
communicator or facilitator to the Contractor, the Placer, and Architect/Engineer for such
projects regarding the metric aspects. Besides direct communications, the Rebar Fabricator
can follow-up and confirm the arrangements via the placing drawings and other submittals
connected with non-metric projects.
Detailing. The Rebar
Fabricator's placing drawings should include information that soft metric bars will be
furnished for the particular non-metric project. If the placing drawings have already been
prepared with designations of inch-pound bars, and it is subsequently decided that soft
metric bars will be furnished to the project, a conversion table could be added to the
placing drawings to cross reference the inch-pound bar sizes with the soft metric bar
sizes. A table similar to Table 1 should suffice. For non-metric projects where the Rebar
Fabricator intends to furnish metric bars at the outset, the placing drawings could be
prepared with the metric bar designations. In this scenario also, a conversion table
similar to Table 1 could be included on the placing drawings.
Fabrication. Since
soft metric rebars are physically the same as corresponding sizes of inch-pound bars, all
aspects of fabricating soft metric rebars will be identical to the fabricating practices
used for inch-pound bars. CRSI has prepared and published Hook Details for ASTM Standard
Metric Rebars -dimensions of end hooks, stirrup hooks, and seismic stirrup/tie hooks-soft
converted values of the standard hook dimensions used for inch-pound bars. See Figure 2.
Bundling and Tagging.
The same practices which a Rebar Fabricator uses for inch-pound bars can be used for
bundling and tagging of soft metric bars. Tags on bundles of soft metric bars should
include cross referencing of the equivalent inch-pound bar size(s). Lengths of bars and
other dimensions can be stated in feet and inches. Weights of bundles of soft metric bars
can be the same as the bundle weights used for inch-pound bars. Weights of bundles of
inch-pound bars can be expressed in pounds.
Role of the Placer.
Ironworkers will have to be made aware that the soft metric bars have different numbers to
designate sizes of the bars. Training aids like Table 1 can be used. If more than one
strength level (Grade of steel) is being used for the particular project, a training aid
similar to Figure 1 can be reviewed. For non-metric construction projects, Ironworkers
will still be working with dimensions in feet and inches. Placing practices for soft
metric bars will be identical to those for inch-pound bars. For metric projects, i.e.,
projects designed in metric units and which will be built in metric units, Ironworkers
will have to become familiar with the overall scheme of metric units. Discussion of such
matters is outside the scope of this brief report. CRSI intends to publish a metric
edition of its popular book, Placing Reinforcing Bars in 1998, which should aid
Ironworkers to become familiar with metric units.
ROLE OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
New Projects in Inch-Pound Units.
The Architect/ Engineer, designing new construction projects which will be built in
inch-pound units, can greatly assist in a smooth transition toward acceptance and adoption
of soft metric bars by initiating changes in the practice of preparing project drawings
and project specifications.
A first step would be to include a conversion table on the project
drawings or in the project specifications. The table would relate the inch-pound rebar
sizes, which are called out on the project drawings, to the soft metric bar designations
in the current ASTM Rebar Specifications. A conversion table similar to Table 1 should
suffice.
A larger step by the Architect/Engineer would be to designate or
label the reinforcing bars on project drawings and in project specifications with the
metric bar designations - using the soft metric designations #10, #13, #16, #19, and so on
in place of the inch-pound designations #3, #4, #5, #6, and so on. Spacings of bars, lap
splice lengths or any other dimensions concerning reinforcing bars can still be expressed
in feet and inches, i.e., retain the current dimensioning practice and units of feet and
inches but change the practice of labeling bar sizes. Examples are:
| Current Practice of
Designating Inch-Pound Bars and Dimensions |
Revised Practice of
Labeling Bars with Metric Size Designations |
| Size and Spacing of Slab Bars #5 @ 12" |
Size and Spacing of Slab Bars #16 @ 12" |
| Size and Spacing of Beam Stirrups #4 @ 10" |
Size and Spacing of Beam Stirrups #13 @ 10" |
| Number and Size of Column Longitudinal Bars 4 - #11 |
Number and Size of Column Longitudinal Bars 4 - #36 |
Size and Spacing of Hoops in
Column & Shear Wall #5 Hoops @ 4" |
Size and Spacing of Hoops in Column & Shear Wall
#16 Hoops @ 4" |
New Projects in Metric Units.
For new construction projects which are required to be designed in metric units, the
thesis of this report is a non-issue. The Architect/Engineer would designate metric
reinforcing bars as #10, #13, #16, etc., on project drawings and in the project
specifications.